<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fight the Good Fight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canescountry.com/blog/2006/12/23/fight-the-good-fight/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canescountry.com/blog/2006/12/23/fight-the-good-fight/</link>
	<description>News and Views about the Carolina Hurricanes and the NHL</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://canescountry.com/blog/2006/12/23/fight-the-good-fight/#comment-1534</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canescountry.com/blog/?p=93#comment-1534</guid>
		<description>yep, I understand.  I was trying to be sarcastic and poke a bit of fun at a couple of the publications that seemed to try to make a big deal of this.  It really doesn't even need to be a "policy", it's just common sense for the most part.  (except if you play for Atlanta).  I think some sports writer turned this into much more than it really is.  Since none of our previous fighters have ever been punished, (that I have noticed), I assumed from the first time I read about it that the policy isn't as rigid as some might have made it out to be.  That, and Lavi himself stated that it has "loopholes".  

I'm going to have to figure out how to notate my sarcastic remarks from my regular ones.  Thanks for your input!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, I understand.  I was trying to be sarcastic and poke a bit of fun at a couple of the publications that seemed to try to make a big deal of this.  It really doesn&#8217;t even need to be a &#8220;policy&#8221;, it&#8217;s just common sense for the most part.  (except if you play for Atlanta).  I think some sports writer turned this into much more than it really is.  Since none of our previous fighters have ever been punished, (that I have noticed), I assumed from the first time I read about it that the policy isn&#8217;t as rigid as some might have made it out to be.  That, and Lavi himself stated that it has &#8220;loopholes&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to have to figure out how to notate my sarcastic remarks from my regular ones.  Thanks for your input!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Acid Queen</title>
		<link>http://canescountry.com/blog/2006/12/23/fight-the-good-fight/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>The Acid Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 23:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canescountry.com/blog/?p=93#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>The "no fighting" policy is an anti-stupidity policy. As in "no trying to goon it up in the last few minutes of a blowout" kinds of stupidity. It's not a "no fighting ever" policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;no fighting&#8221; policy is an anti-stupidity policy. As in &#8220;no trying to goon it up in the last few minutes of a blowout&#8221; kinds of stupidity. It&#8217;s not a &#8220;no fighting ever&#8221; policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
